Wednesday 4 May 2016

Trump the nominee

So he has done it. Or at least got half way there.

Mr Trump has all but won the Republican nomination to run for the Whitehouse.

Much as I, personally, like Bernie Sanders, Mrs Clinton will be his opponent, barring some sort of miracle or natural disaster.

Whatever the American establishment may think, a country can survive being lead by an individual that it is difficult to take seriously. Just think about Italy and Silvio Berlusconi.

That doesn't mean he will be President.

I don't much like Mrs Clinton, but I would think him a much worse choice than her.

The conventional wisdom is he cannot win. He will be slaughtered in a general election.

After all, Mr Trump has insulted not only Muslims and immigrants, but also Mexicans and women.

Women alone make up more than half of the electorate. His tally must be at least 60% of voters insulted.

Surely he can't win?

Thing is, only people abnormally interested in politics have really been paying attention.

Mr Trump has strong appeal amongst poorer white people. People who would have had solid union jobs in past generations. There is no doubt in my mind he will be able to portray himself very differently indeed when it comes to the general election.

The transformation will be shameless. Mrs Clinton may find it difficult to cope with that. To take him seriously.

And Mrs Clinton herself is rather unpopular. Very unpopular with republicans. Could be she is just the person to motivate republicans to get up and out and vote for Trump.

I am aware that people who know far more about US politics than I do give him no chance. But those people also gave him no chance at the primaries.

Mr Trump will be able to portray himself as the insurgent against the Clinton establishment. And however Mrs Clinton chooses to play it, there will be a whole raft of people saying vote Clinton just because she is a woman. That could backfire. It wouldn't sound very good coming from a man.

Janet Yellen was given the Federal Reserve job when an outsider should really have been picked. Christine Lagarde became head of the IMF when Europe should really have backed away.

Were I inclined to conspiracy theories I would believe that elites hand leadership roles to women as a last resort to stop power dissipating further.

Mrs Clinton comes across as calculated. Devoid of principles, I have heard her Democratic party described as a brokerage for interest groups. That's an unkind way of putting their point that demography is on their side.

If I were to pick a candidate to neutralise Mr Trump's appeal, Bernie Sanders would be a much better bet than Hilary Clinton.

For years, we on the left have been told we must accept establishment candidates, because a true leftist has no chance of winning. How ironic it would be were Mrs Clinton to lose precisely because she was so establishment.

And what a shame if the first serious female candidate were to lose because she was too establishment.

No comments:

Post a Comment